The Anatomy of Apostasy
The English word
"apostasy" comes from the Greek word apostatia
. The apo means "away" and the
statia means "a standing." So,
apostasy is the abandonment of what was once believed.
It is the moving away from the standard.
In October of 1997, it came to our
attention that a meeting had been called by an organization
called: Vision New England. The announced goal of
the meeting was to get members of the Evangelical
community and the Roman Catholic community to come
together for a healthy dialogue on the Evangelical
and Catholics Together (ECT) Statement issued in the
spring of 1994.
The cover letter announcing the meeting
proposed the following:
"In anticipation of our gathering
together next Tuesday, October 28, I am enclosing
a copy of ECT. Please come having digested this
document and be prepared to dialogue with
one another on this topic." (Emphasis added)
We accepted the invitation and came
prepared to dialogue, having digested the ECT statement.
We were not prepared for what ensued at this meeting.
In its promotional brochure, Vision
New England touts itself as an organization which
hopes to unite Christians for effective evangelism:
"For 110 years Vision New England,
formerly known as the Evangelistic Association of
New England, has been a cutting-edge ministry that
brought believers and churches together for evangelism
and renewal. Now the largest regional association
in the country, more than 28 Vision New England ministry
initiatives serve more than 3,000 churches in 80 denominations."
We mention also that in a hand-out
kit given to each participant at the meeting was a
one page statement indicating that Steve Macchia,
the president of Vision New England, and Fr. John
MacInnis started Evangelical/Catholic initiatives
as far back as 1990.
With this as a backdrop, we move
now to the meeting itself. The format consisted of
two guest speakers followed by a lunch and small group
meetings. The chief spokesperson for the Evangelical
side of things was Dr. Kent Hill, the president of
Eastern Nazarene College. The chief spokesperson for
Romanism was William F. Murphy, the Vicar General
and Moderator of the Curia of the Archdiocese of Boston.
Both speakers were original signers of the ECT.
Both men exalted the work of ECT
and generally endorsed the document with some minor
exceptions. Dr. Hill and William Murphy were both
concerned that much more work needed to be done but
that all in all, everyone was headed in the right
direction. Dr. Hill spoke of two areas of criticism
that ECT had received from the Evangelical community.
The first was the undermining of evangelism toward
Roman Catholics and the second was the vague language
used to define "justification." Dr. Hill
promised that these misconceptions would be clarified
by a forthcoming document which has since come to
be known as The Gift of Salvation . (We have reviewed
this latest ecumenical tool in our new book, On
The Edge of Apostasy.)
The entire morning was taken up with
these two speakers in which there was considerable
nodding in agreement among the participants. It appeared
that the Romish community sent roughly 25 representatives
with Evangelicals making up the difference in the
room of about 50 people.
Our discouragement began with the
realization and growing awareness that this was not
going to be a "dialogue over ECT," but rather
a celebration and ratification of it. Consequently,
we found ourselves in the strictest minority and were
saddled with the sad truth that the largest regional
professing evangelical association in the nation had
already endorsed the ECT. This meeting did not approach
the expressed intent of the cover letter. It was an
announcement of acceptance. It was not a dialogue
to consider the merits of ECT.
Needless to say, we felt like the
proverbial jilted lover who went expecting to dialogue
with his sweetheart over some flirtations from other
boys only to find himself in the middle of her wedding
reception. He never knew she was seeing anyone else,
let alone getting married. Such is the case with Vision
New England.
We wonder out loud how many member
churches in New England are aware that their membership
dues go in part to funding a leadership that has sold
the Gospel down the river to Roman Catholicism? We
wonder aloud who empowers men like Steve Macchia to
negotiate away the Gospel of God including Sola
Scriptura and Sola Fide ? Who are these
guys? What is going on in the minds of pastors, deacons,
elders and leadership at the local church level which
tolerates such open apostasy?
So bizarre and flagrant is the abuse
of Christian terminology by Vision New England, that
they have the audacity to promote themselves as dedicated
to uniting Christians for effective evangelism
. We ask, "With what gospel will New England
be evangelized?" If Rome is "in" then
so is infant baptism for the remission of sin, so
are the sacraments, so is purgatory, so is the worship
of Mary, so is justification by works produced by
grace merited from obedience to Romish religious rituals
and superstitions.
For our part, we went to this convocation
to dialogue. We went to bear witness that the ECT
was perfectly repulsive to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
We went to challenge the speakers who touted it so
highly. We went to show that ECT was anti-Christ if
anything at all. We were not received very well.
Having personally stood up and spoken
to the entire audience and distributed literature
among the participants, I went away heart sick and
beat down. To think that such a large segment of Evangelicalism
is selling its soul to the Romish religion is enough
to cause some sincere reflection on where this nation
is headed. It is either a precursor to the curse
of God or it is the curse of God itself when apostasy
is this bold and this sustained.
Hiding behind words like "grace,"
"love," "unity," and "peace"
along with the catch-all phrase "let us be reconciled,"
Vision New England has closed the door on any meaningful
expression of sound doctrine and theology. We are
left with the mush of "do good-ism" and
"the elevation of the impoverished masses of
humanity which surround us" in the place of the
Gospel of Christ.
Mark our words, when such useless
trite little phrases like "the Gospel of Jesus
Christ is better shown than it is spoken,"
not only gain the upper-hand but sweep away solid
doctrine, we have jettisoned the cause of Christ.
When truth is crushed and mangled through the grinder
of ecumenical bureaucrats who say such nonsense as,
"we have a loving method and God seeks peace
and unity with all men," it will not be long
before all true believers are forced underground by
the apostates. More and more, the apostates control
the purse strings of professing evangelicals who are
content to see no evil, hear no evil and refuse to
speak out against such evil.
We, however, shall speak. With the
apostle, we believe, therefore, we speak. With Luther,
we can do nothing other than to press the fight to
the fore and never ever give in to the ecumania
that has diseased the theological immune system of
those who call themselves "of Christ." Vision
New England, sad to say, is not the exception. They
are, however, a frightening illustration of all that
is wrong with churches in America.
In a letter written to Mr. Macchia,
president of Vision New England, I challenged him
to ponder if perhaps he had departed from the faith
once delivered among the saints. His response is as
follows:
"Finally, Mr. Zins, I find
it disconcerting that you could judge my heart as
having 'departed from the faith once delivered among
the saints.' Like Paul, I don't judge myself, or
you, but rather pray for humility and grace, the
kind we saw exhibited by our Roman Catholic friends
at the dialogue when they encouraged you to speak
openly at the luncheon and then offered to hand
out your document to those in attendance. This grace
looks beyond our differences to the One who reconciled
the world to Himself and has given us the ministry
of reconciliation."
What Mr. Macchia leaves out of his
truncated quotation from the apostle Paul are the
two verses immediately preceding it:
"This is how one should regard
us, as servants of Christ and stewards of the mysteries
of God. Moreover, it is required of stewards
that they be found trustworthy " (1 Corinthians
4:2).
We are not to be blissfully non-judgmental
of our gospel and our faithfulness to the Bible, as
Mr. Macchia implies. Rather, we are to strive to be
faithful, and as Paul says later, "take pains
to do what is right." (2 Corinthians 8:21) We
strive to be faithful and to judge our actions precisely
because it is God who will ultimately judge our fidelity
to His gospel.
Mr. Macchia and Vision New England
indeed need to "examine themselves to see whether
they are in the faith," (2 Corinthians 13:5).
They need to cease their ill-fated Romance with Rome
and return to safe mooring in the harbor of our Lord's
Gospel. |